Our Wedding Blog |
|
As is the current trend, most everyone is convinced that the mundane details of their lives are worthy publication for the reading pleasure of millions in blogs. We are no different.
Because wedding planning is such an exciting affair, filled with riveting decisions on topics such as invitation paper thickness and the number of forks in a table setting, we'd like to share this with you. We now get goosebumps just thinking about cocktail napkins! Ooo, la-la! Admit it. You like it. We're not exactly Angelina and Brad, but everyone has an inner voyeur.
Pain and PerseveranceCurt soldiers on for Chantal after a devastating injury. Posted by Curtis on April 9, 2007
I have broken and dislocated my elbow, dislocated one shoulder three times, broken a collarbone, chipped a bone in my ankle, had stitches or staples in at least eight places, and torn both groin muscles on a freak teeter-totter accident, but nothing could prepare me for this ill-timed injury - breaking my right pinky finger four and a half weeks before our wedding. You can see the carnage in the accompanying photo (may not be appropriate for small children).
Though I have a broken bone and it happens to be in my finger, Chantal refuses to let me call it a "broken finger." She prefers to say, "He just chipped a bone in his finger," downplaying the significance of the situation. This could possibly be because she thinks I'm a big baby, but I tend to think this is her way of dealing with the pain and masking her emotions. Behind closed doors she has been oh so supportive, though I'm not permitted to let my finger split touch any part of her body.
How did it happen? The usual. I was playing basketball and someone through a pass to me while I was cutting to the hoop. I try to move before I caught the ball and didn't watch the ball into my hands, instead trying the unorthodox maneuver of catching the ball with the tip of my finger. Ouchie. Jammed fingers are pretty common in hoops, so I didn't think much of it, but took myself out of the game to get some ice on it. It swelled up something fierce, with some nice bruising, and after a week it was still somewhat swollen and very tender to the touch. I broke down last Thursday and got an x-ray.
So what the heck does this have to do with our wedding? (Chantal asked this while I was holding up my x-ray to my computer screen to get a good photo of it.) Well, my doctor told me to wear a split for a week and come back to check with him this week. I have to wear the split to prevent "finger droop" and I may potentially have to wear it for as long as six weeks – that would be through our wedding and honeymoon. Kind of a drag. Also, depending of what the doctor says, I might not be able to play golf the Friday before our wedding. Even more of a drag.
I'll find out more after talking to my doctor on Thursday. In lieu of flowers, please send gifts to the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.
(I've experienced a touch of deja vu with this situation. When Jake and Kelly got married about a decade ago, I was their best man. A day or two before their wedding I had purchased a butterfly knife and after owning it for about two hours, sliced open my finger. Luckily, the emergency room was walking distance and I headed over there to have about six stitches sewn into my finger, having to wear a bandage on it for their wedding. In a strange coincidence, I had the same nurse for my next emergency room trip when I broke my collarbone.)
[4/14 Update - Turns out I have to wear a splint for at least the next 5 weeks. Lucky, that covers our entire wedding and honeymoon period. Ug. And sorry, but no hand shaking at the wedding!]
Permalink |
How Lucky Am I? Two Bachelor Parties!Curt’s second bachelor party stays local at Stinson Beach Posted by Curtis on April 2, 2007
One week after my Cabo bachelor party, I had a second bachelor party. This one was held by the Skunks plus one (Geoff Lomax, aka Schmax) and stayed local at Stinson Beach. The Skunks had all recently been to Mexico for Jason and Fiona's wedding in December, so another trip to Mexico wasn't exactly up their alley. Clearly, that wasn't a problem for me.
The Skunk bachelor parties follow a pretty typical pattern, and since I'm the last Skunk to get married, that pattern is well established. First, there's usually some athletic activity (rafting, basketball, skiing, etc.). Second, there's always fire involved. Typically, this occurs in BBQs, though sometimes at bonfires in Christmas tree farms. Third, there is always some political conversation and debate. Fourth, someone always drinks too much. Fifth, and most important, one night involves staying up drinking White Russians and watching the first half of the Big Lebowski with most everyone falling asleep around the scene with Jackie Treehorn.
Friday night was the night where someone drank too much and we watched Lebowski. (In a twist we watched the second half of the movie Sunday morning.) Saturday was a glorious day that started off with Schmax gunning Earth, Wind and Fire at 7 AM to wake us up for a round of golf at San Geronimo (amazing because most of the group doesn't really even play golf). The weather was picture perfect and we got back into time to watch the entire, glorious UCLA game. (Go Bruins!). Dinner involved grilling seven t-bone steaks with 8-11 year old French wines, followed by an around the table discussion of the presidential primary candidates. We doubled-up on the athletic events by playing beer pong into the night, until we ran out of drinkable beer and switched to margarita pong.
Thanks to the Skunks et al for another great weekend. Now I must rest for the next month until the wedding.
Permalink |
Curt Relives Spring Break in CaboCurt’s first bachelor party takes place in Cabo San Lucas Posted by Curtis on March 27, 2007
A couple of weekends ago I had my first bachelor party in Cabo San Lucas. We happened to go in mid March, which coincidentally enough, is spring break. Though I had never been to Cabo, or Mexico, for spring break, some of the items from my actual spring breaks in college found their way to Mexico. Of special note was Fun Island. We had Fun Island with us in 1993 on a houseboat trip to Lake Mead. Lewis, for reasons only known to him, had kept that same inflatable disk for 14 years and brought it to Cabo, where we sadly left it behind in the pool at our villa. Chantal commented that she thought Lewis' gesture was "sweet and touching." Though I'm sure flattered, I doubt that's what he was going for.
And that villa, as Rebecca would say, was amazing! It was called Villa las Flores and was about three-quarters the way up the hill facing the Pacific Ocean. I got to sleep in the master bedroom, which was about the size of our apartment in Oakland. I know that in the past I may have used hyperbole here or there to make a point, but I'm not exaggerating. It was huge!
I'll spare you all the details (I'm not stupid), but we had a great group of eleven, all of with which I went to either high school or college, and in Mike's case both. We did all of the typical things a group of guys in their mid-thirties would do in Cabo for a bachelor party during spring break. We had an emotional book club meeting (Tuesdays with Morrie), went on sunrise nature walks on the beach, volunteered at a local orphanage and then sat around the fire pit each sharing with the group their biggest hopes and fears for the upcoming year. Who am I kidding. Someone was taken out of their bed and thrown into the pool, we smoked Cuban cigars, we stopped by Costco on the way into town to buy cases of beer and tequila, someone made a tee-shirt with my face on it, and one guy did his best Nacho Libre impression wearing a Mexican wrestling mask and running around yelling, "Fear the Rooster" for no apparent reason.
Thanks again to Mike for organizing the trip and for all ten of you that made the trip. What a blast!
Permalink |
Tuxedos, James Bond and Brides in DragCurt goes for the Bond/Clooney look, but falls for a Goth, cross dressing bride Posted by Curtis on March 14, 2007
Single button, peaked lapel. Who knew it would be so difficult to find such a traditional tuxedo?
I own a three button, notched lapel tuxedo that I purchased on sale some years ago. I haven't worn it a lot, but enough that I've more than broken even on the purchase once/rent multiple times tradeoff. However, I decided that my current tuxedo looks a bit too much like a normal suit, so I consulted my consigliere on the matter. We decided that the single button, peaked lapel style was a more traditional, James Bond feel, something that George Clooney would wear. Since George and I are both smooth with the ladies and envied by the gentleman, I had my heart set on that style.
My plan was to purchase a tux for myself so that I would feel 100% comfortable in my clothes on my wedding day. Since I knew that Mike owned his own tuxes (yes, plural), I floated the idea that my other groomsmen could just wear what they wanted. I soon discovered that since none of them own a tux, and really why would they, that I might as well pick something out for them at a rental store. OK, easy enough.
Mike and I went to Saks Fifth Avenue, Bloomingdales, Nordstrom's, Macy's, Men's Wearhouse, Selix, Neiman Marcus and some random Italian suit store. Only Saks and Neiman's even carry single button, peaked lapel tuxes, with the cheapest at $1,200. Yikes! So I'm either hideously out of style or incredibly forward thinking in my retro, formalwear sensibilities. Either way, I ain't rich, so the purchase angle was a non-starter.
We then went to Selix and reserved a certain style for the groomsmen, ring bearers and my father. Later, we went to the Men's Wearhouse and spent 45 minutes haggling to get a reduced price and those are probably the rented tuxes we'll all be wearing come April 28.
Now, I'm glossing over something that happened at Selix, because I'm not sure how to describe it. It was sort of a Goth bride/drag queen flash mob. There I was trying on a tuxedo jacket, when about 50 men and women, all dressed in some sort of Goth wedding dresses, came storming in. Two men in dresses ran the distance of the store and threw themselves at my feet, asking for my hand in marriage. They then started wrestling to win my affection. The winner was this lovely blonde specimen who good-naturedly wanted to discuss our upcoming nuptials. It's too bad there weren't any better pictures of the wrestling, but they asked me to "act scared" when it was all over, and this is the best I could do. Turns out this was part of annual Brides of March event, which judging from the breath of a couple of the brides, was definitely part bar crawl.
I'm pretty sure this was some sort of omen for our wedding, but I'm not sure what it signifies. I searched online for "drunk cross-dressing brides wrestling for groom's hand in marriage" and came up blank. Oh well, I'll just make sure to tell Chantal how lucky she is. After all, I had two brides fighting to marry me on the spot!
Permalink |
What Color is My Parachute?Curt takes his eye off the wedding ball to find a new career Posted by Curtis on March 2, 2007
I've been tasked by the most wonderful woman in the world with a myriad of wedding related projects to accomplish. These include things like buying a tux, finding a place for my groomsman and others from which they may rent tuxes, getting the ceremony music set, getting visas for our honeymoon, etc. Unfortunately, events out of my control may have conspired to have me miss all of my wedding related deadlines. I need to find a new career.
You see, GetActive Software, the software company with I helped co-found nearly seven years ago, was recently purchased by one of our competitors, Convio. It was a friendly acquisition and has felt in many regards like a merger. Now don't start congratulating me on my big pay day. This is no YouTube deal. With our lack of business acumen, we actually have revenue, so it's just a stock swap and Convio isn't public, yet. It means that if Convio goes public I may get something for the effort. For now, I'm just getting a pink slip.
Actually, it's not quite that dramatic, as I'm staying around through June 30 to help project manage the integration of the two companies. I'm currently the VP of HR and Convio has a perfectly capable VP of HR in their Austin headquarters and there can be only one. Besides, since I've run the client services department, been the company's accountant and held several other jobs over the years, there really aren't many things for me to do.
Maybe it's time for me to put those public policy and public health degrees to work? After all, I'm still paying for them a little each month and it's time they pay me back. I'm not exactly sure what I'll do next, but in the midst of all of this wedding planning, I need to find the time to start doing some informational interviews in different sectors. I could always go back to politics or an advocacy-based nonprofit. Work at a think tank or a foundation sounds interesting to me, as well. How about a full-time blogger? Ask me again in a few days and I'll probably have other ideas.
I guess the reason I'm posting this is in an attempt to head off having to explain what I'm doing 100+ times over our wedding weekend when the explanation simply won't be short and to the point. I hope to have more clarity by then, but I'll probably still be trying to figure it out. The only thing I know for sure is that given that most of my vocational interests seem to be pointing towards positions with more modest compensation, Chantal and I may have to start economizing on the things of luxury in the future, such as front doors, ceilings and color in our clothing.
Permalink |
Other Wedding Websites? Ha!Curt gets competitve with other wedding websites for really no reason at all Posted by Curtis on February 24, 2007
So I was looking at our Google Analytics site again recently and noticed this pie chart on the left. I was shocked to see that 45% of our traffic comes from someplace called UltimateWedding.com. So somehow we're getting more traffic from this site than from our own friends and family, assuming that they'd be in the "direct" category. What is this site?
It appears to be a aggregator site for all crap, err, I mean, critical information about weddings. But more interesting, after poking around the site for a while, I discovered how this site was driving traffic to our wedding site. It looks like different wedding blogs are linked to from their website. Here we are on the 2007 page. Hmm, let's look at some of these other websites in 2007...
Well, now this is a little touchy. These are people in love and it would be poor karmic form for me to be too critical. But, I just couldn’t help with some observations:
Pete and Katy write many more blog entries than we do. I think they have more postings in just February than we have in total. So, no one can call us “crazy” and “losers” for spending time on this. Others appear to have even more time on their hands than even us.
Nathaniel and Tiffany have the most annoying website because of one factor, when you move your mouse over their site this “We’re getting’ hitched” text follows it all over the screen.
Elena and Allen are having a black and white art deco wedding. I now feel pretty boring. Best we can do is Skunks as ushers, and they aren't even real.
To be honest, no real competition here on the website front, though. Digging through the stats again, I noticed that we have received a much smaller amount of traffic from a place called Wedding Towne. Now this is interesting because people can actually rate wedding websites. I found us on the “C” page and discovered that we have one “thumb up,” so someone liked our site. Then I clicked on “Top Sites” and discovered that eight sites have five “thumbs up.” Five! And we have only one! OK, some of these top eight sites are pretty slick. I’d say they are rated so high because, well, they had actual web designers work on them and not some random guy currently working in the HR department of a software company. (That’s me.)
However, I still feel better about our content. Damn it, we’re funny! But good content alone doesn’t seem to get you extra “thumbs up.” So I implore you all visit our page on this site and give us the finger, specifically the thumb.
Permalink |
Debbie and Kirsten get their dueChantal and Curt give back to those that gave them so much Posted by Curtis on January 27, 2007
The other night we had Debbie Krackeler and Kirsten Olsen over for dinner (as well as their significant others Tom Krackeler and Colin Cahil). Over some braised chicken thighs, carrot puree and the soulful tunes of Jack Johnson’s guitar, Debbie, Kirsten, Chantal and I for the first time exchanged our points of view of Chantal and my epic introduction. Some interesting things came out of this conversation:
1. I believe that after I gave Debbie medical advice regarding Tom’s broken collarbone, broken while body-surfing in Mexico, that she made it her own personal mission to find me a soul mate. Debbie contends that she’s always thought I was good guy and was regularly thinking about good matches for me. I guess I can’t argue with that.
2. When Debbie first asked Kirsten if she was dating anyone, she replied, “Why?” After Debbie described me to her, she indicated that she was dating someone. Sounds like she took a pass on me. Hmm. I’m not sure Debbie was packaging me in the best light.
3. Apparently, I made some joke in an email to Debbie about being game for a “double-blind date” even though I may be the placebo, or something like that. Unknown to me, Debbie forwarded that to Kirsten, who forwarded it to Chantal. Chantal thought it was funny, the first time. You see, when we finally introduced ourselves via email I used the same joke, thinking that she hadn’t heard it before. Chantal didn’t think it was a funny the second time.
Anyway, after dinner we bestowed upon them a tremendous honor. Given their pivotal role in our relationship (and despite Kirsten’s lapse in judgment), we asked them to “MC” our rehearsal dinner. Look how excited they were! We’re currently thinking that we have only a few toasts at the wedding and more of them at the rehearsal dinner. Therefore, we’ll need someone to introduce the speakers and manage the clock with grace and aplomb. Debbie and Kirsten, start your planning…
Permalink |
Chantal and Curt meet their biggest fanChantal and Curt meet a woman in Connecticut addicted to their website Posted by Chantal on January 3, 2007
 |
Meet our biggest fan. She’s a Connecticut native, an attorney, and a mother of two boys. She’s not from our “typical” fan base, but we’ll proudly welcome her aboard. You see Roz (featured in the photo) is my sister Rhodie’s neighbor. Rhodie has been telling Roz about her younger sister’s upcoming nuptials and she shared the www.curtisandchantal.com link with Roz for some light entertainment (when the Netflix subscription lapses, a gal needs something else to view with the accompanying glass of Chardonnay). Roz took great delight in the “he said, she said” meeting story, she cherished the portion on our engagement in Half Moon Bay, and she wept (fetal position, rocking) when reading through our gift registry (sort of). Roz now notifies my sister of new blogs and has marked our website as a “favorite”. We may have only just met Roz, she may not be attending our wedding, and we may not even know her last name, but we’re proud that at least someone is reading (and appreciating) our award-winning prose. Roz – we salute you.
Permalink |
Analyzing our Site TrafficCurtis has far too much free time on his hands and discovers Google Analytics Posted by Curtis on December 22, 2006
I know that you are all wondering the same thing - how much traffic is our website generating. What? Hasn't crossed your mind? To be honest, I'm a little surprised.
Luckily for us all, I've discovered Google Analytics and since October I've been tracking visits to our website. I have to admit, it's a pretty easy (and free) tool to implement. Just put a code snippet in our site's wrapper and that was about it.
As you can see from this chart, we average about 4.4 page views per unique visit and have had 387 unique visits since the beginning of October. Digging through the data a little more, I was disappointed to see that 74% of our visitors are first time visitors, meaning that the vast majority of visitors do not come back for seconds. Now, if each visitor is only looking at 4-5 pages, it means that the nooks and crannies of our fabulous wedding planning are being overlooked by the 282 different individuals that have viewed our site.
What else have I learned?
- Our blog is the most popular page, accounting for 17% of our page views.
- Chantal's bio is more popular than mine (85 pageviews to 56 pageviews). I'm attributing that to the finely written text and not the subject matter.
- Chantal's bridesmaids' page is more popular than the page for my groomsmen (66 pageviews to 45 pageview). I'm attributing that to the subject matter.
- There have been 11 visits to our site that lasted more than 30 minutes. Probably enough to read 5% of the content.
- 72% use Internet Explorer and 23% use Firefox to view our site. 94% use Windows and only 6% are on Macintoshes.
Perhaps most interesting has been the countries of some of our visitors. They have included Canada, Australia, Philippines, United Kingdom, Indonesia, Tanzania, Malaysia, Singapore, Egypt, Turkey, Austria, Malta, New Zealand, France & Mexico. Now these could just be automated programs searching the web for indexing purposes or what have you, but I'd like to think it's because we have such an amazing international love and sense of humor that crosses political, cultural and language boundaries. Why else would someone from Turkey look at our site?
Permalink |
Chantal Nearly Drowns in Styrofoam PeanutsCurts has too much time and too many packing materials on his hands Posted by Chantal on December 13, 2006
It was a typical Tuesday night. I arrived home from work and began unloading the dishwasher, cleaning the countertops and organizing the mail. Curtis sat on the couch and stared at Styrofoam. I made some dinner, took out the trash and started a load of laundry. Curtis sat on the couch and stared at Styrofoam. Some might think that Curtis is unmotivated or slow-moving – but the story goes on. As I made the bed and organized my lunch for the following day Curtis arose from the couch in a state of glee and squealed, “I’ve figured it out!”. Boxes appeared, tape was used, his mind was racing….and suddenly, I found my head submerged in a sea of Styrofoam pieces with Curtis yelling, “Work the camera, for the love of God, work the camera!”
So, this is a big thank you to those of you who have already begun sending gifts with the millions of pieces of wonderful Styrofoam….thank you for challenging Curtis’s creative juices, for allowing me to be an accomplice in his antics, and for ensuring that our Tuesdays are far from typical.
Permalink |
Chantal and Curtis Got Married Last SaturdayOn October 28 Chantal and Curtis were wed, piercings and all. Posted by Curtis on November 3, 2006
Chantal and Curtis did get married on Saturday, October 26. Just not this Chantal and Curtis; rather, it was the imposters.
Anyway, while we didn't get married, we did return to the scene of the crime, Half Moon Bay. In fact, literally the place at which I asked Chantal to marry me. This bench is the one on which we sat when Chantal noticed my racing heart. On our way back home, we returned to "our bench." We were hoping to get a picture of ourselves sitting on it, but the couple of teenagers in all black on the bench next to us were too busy groping each other to help us out.
In reality, this weekend was Chantal's treat for my birthday (October 17 for next year, everyone). Over Labor Day we saw this fantastic jazz vocalist at the Oakland Art and Soul festival, Kim Nalley. Her rendition of "Mississippi Goddamn" has been ringing through our apartment for weeks. She was set to sing at a restaurant in Half Moon Bay, Cetrella. When we arrived, we discovered that Kim had a "leg injury" and wouldn't be there. Ug. At least we got have a nice dinner, though not without biblical disasters. The table next to us somehow managed to light on fire the napkin in their bread basket, placing it on the ground and dousing it with water. (Fire.) Then our busboy kicked over the stand chilling our white wine, soaking a different patron. (Flood.) However, the swordfish was good, we got a second bottle of wine for free and our waitress gave us a homeopathic cold remedy (taking a hot bath in a tub filled with mint leaves).
At least we got a good night sleep at the Half Moon Bay Inn. Rrrright. You see, Saturday night was a daylight savings switch, "fall back." So when the alarm clock in the room next door went off at 6:30 AM, it was really 5:30 AM. Luckily, no one was sleeping next door. After about 30 minutes I got up to try and find someone at the inn to turn it off. Unfortunately, there really isn't a front desk at the inn, just the host table of the restaurant. After another 30 minutes of us sleeping with pillows over our ears, the alarm ceased. Ahhhh. I guess the moral of the story is when facing floods, fires and other tragedies, make like an ostrich and cover your head until they go away. Wait, that's a terrible moral. I'm revising that. Just go ahead, drink several bottles of wine with someone you love and sleep it off. (Not to be tried if you are under 21, pregnant or on certain prescription medications.)
Permalink |
China and Flatware and Butter Plates. Oh, My!Curt discovers that fine china is in his future. Posted by Curtis on October 26, 2006
We’ve been doing the wedding registry thing now for a couple of weeks. It all started off innocently enough. Another couple told us about a very clever program at Williams Sonoma. In their San Francisco store they invite engaged couples to come to a Sunday brunch, about an hour or so before the store opens. They fix you breakfast and walk you through the process, all the while lulling you into a sense that there is no way you will ever be able to feed yourself without their cookware. In fact, you’re almost convinced that you can’t start your day without miniature pumpkin bundt cakes. Almost.
Since I cook about as much, and maybe a tad more, than Chantal, I was into the cookware and we were both in agreement for those items. Things got a little trickier when in came to china and flatware. You see, I just didn’t understand the point of fine china and everyday china. Why not just get one set? As I often do when faced with weighty quandaries, I turned to one of my fantasy football leagues for guidance – The Richard and Rhoda Goldman Fantasy Football League (RRG-FFL).
The RRG-FFL has been around for 10 years and I’m one of the few unmarried members. In fact, we have two married couples in the league. So, I figured I could get some sage advice from this group. Here’s a sample of what I learned…
“On the china front, I have been married 11 years next month. We have broken out our china 5 times total (one more time than our $250 Juiceman that we are finally selling at a yard sale). The cream dispensers and butter dishes are in the same damn box as when we got them as gifts.”
“How about the bread maker and ice cream machine? The lesson here is to not buy equipment that produces products you can easily buy at a grocery store for a few bucks. We average about 0.65 fine china usages per year. On a per usage basis, the cost is absurd, unless you live to about 200 years old and continue to use it. The other nice benefit is that you have to hand wash it.”
“Cafeware” came up and I asked, “At the risk of completly turning our once proud league into Pottery Barn magazine club, what's cafeware?” I was told, “Remember Garanimals? It's sort of like that, but dishes.”
My mind was clearly made up on the topic, even announcing as much to the league. I then received a chorus of emails sent directly to me all along the lines of, “Oh, you’ll end-up with two sets of china and flatware and you’ll like it. Resistance is futile.”
Well, if that’s the case, does anybody have advice on patterns?
Permalink |
El Nino: The Worst Kind of Wedding CrasherCurt laments his recent discovery that this winter/spring is going to be an El Nino year. Posted by Curtis on October 2, 2006
We've spent many, many (did I say "many?") hours agonizing over our guest list, an experience that many of you married folk probably to this day attempt to push to the recesses of you mind. We've basically got it set, with maybe a few tweaks on the margins here or there. However, one name was explicitly left off of our list – El Nino. I've spent some winters and springs with the fella and I don't want him anywhere near our wedding. But, as I discovered recently, he is apparently planning on crashing our nuptials.
For those of you non Californians, El Nino is this strange meteorological phenomenon that occurs every 2-7 years where the Pacific Ocean gets warmer than it ought to in the winter and we end-up with a ton of rain. Problem is I can remember past El Nino years where our winter started off milder than normal and drier than normal, only to have it rain cats-and-dogs late into the spring. Since we are getting married in the spring with an outdoor ceremony, you can understand my concern.
At this point, there really isn’t much sense in us freaking out over this. I’m still trying to talk Chantal down from the fact that it’s OK that the white wine glasses we registered for are labeled as red wine glasses on the registry web site. We’re going to be pouring "Two Buck Chuck” Pinot Grigio in them anyway, and not some cheap airplane swill, so I don't see what the big deal is. (PS - we're still working on our registry so please, no purchases, yet!) Can you imagine me asking Chantal if her wedding dress is waterproof or has a detachable hood? Let’s just keep this between me and, well, me since I’m fairly certain no one actually reads this blog. But, just in case, please pack a rain poncho in April.
Permalink |
Other People's WeddingsObservations from other people's weddings Posted by Curtis on September 18, 2006
Over the weekend of September 8-10, Chantal and I were in Washington, DC to celebrate the wedding of my cousin, David Barnes, and his now wife, Deborah Corey. As you can tell from the accompanying photo, there was dancing and we enjoyed a few refreshing adult beverages. The only hiccup to the great festivities was that David and Deborah were planning on going to Bermuda for their honeymoon, but because of Hurricane Florence, may have had to delay the start of their trip (it was up in the air when we last saw them on Sunday).
Now I've been to a lot of weddings (when putting together our first cut at a guest list I think I had been invited to 35+) and I have to admit that starting around wedding number 20, I had formulated some opinions about what I liked and didn't like. However, since our engagement, we've now found ourselves paying extra special attention to the weddings we attend. I'm not saying that we put together spreadsheets and rate various items on a 1-10 scale, as Chantal had once proposed, but we definitely do some post-wedding debriefing.
I'm self-aware enough to know that I have more opinions than the average groom. For example, I do know that I don't want the "Money Dance" at our wedding. I'm pretty sure that opinion was forged during Jake and Kelly's wedding some years ago, when Mike, during the "Money Dance," cut in line (and in front of a ring boy) and then told Kelly that he didn't have any cash, but wondered if she took credit. Also in the category of things I don't want to see is the "Chicken Dance." I see no reason to further the stereotype that white people can't dance at our wedding, despite Chad Johnson's new favorite end zone celebration. But while we're talking wedding dances, is there any question that after Chantal performed the "Old School" version of "Total Eclipse of the Heart" at Tom and Debbie's wedding that this wouldn't make the perfect first dance for the two us?
We have several more weddings to attend before ours, but don't let this worry you upcoming brides and grooms. Just ignore our note taking. We'll just be smiling, judging, watching…
Permalink |
There may be French disco at our weddingChantal Curtis is discovered Posted by Curtis on August 28, 2006
So last week Chantal's sister Rhodie picked us up from Logan on route to their parents' house on Cape Cod. She was commenting on our glorious web site, showering me with accolades for my wit and thoroughness. OK, she was mostly commenting on my thoroughness and openly wondering if I have a full-time job, but that's not important right now.
We were talking about the other Chantal and Curtis getting married this October and Rhodie mentioned that she had searched for "Chantal Curtis" on Google, or something like that, and discovered that there actually existed a disco vocalist by that name. I simply had to look it up.
According to the Deep Groove Encyclopedia, "Chantal Curtis is responsible for one of better examples of French disco, 'Get Another Love.'" Who knew there was French disco? But more importantly, Chantal was named Chantal Noelle during her parents' "French phase," which covered the mid to late 70's, coincidentally the same time period in which Chantal Curtis was cutting her albums. Could it be that she was named after this lavendar-adorned disco queen? Could her parents have taken their French phase far enough to actually shake their groove things to French disco while touring the French countryside in search of the perfect Beaujolais? Could it also explain their surprising fondness of their son-in-law-to-be?
In any event, Chantal Curtis apparently passed away in either 1985 or 1986 and may have in fact been killed by her boyfriend. Could "Get Another Love" have been foreshadowing? Either way, it probably wouldn't make a very good first dance song, but maybe we can slip in one of her tunes as a little tribute. If we do, keep an eye on Don and Susie. If you see them breaking out any vintage 1970's moves, we'll know the truth.
Permalink |
Imposters!Curtis and Chantal discover that they are not alone Posted by Curtis on August 20, 2006
Why curtisandchantal.com and not chantalandcurtis.com? Am I male chauvinist? Do I love myself more than Chantal? I'll answer the first question and assume that the second two are rhetorical.
Simple. When I tried to buy chantalandcurtis.com, I discoverd that it had been taken by someplace called eWeddings.com. The site was basically blank and I assumed that at some point in time Chantal had signed up for some random wedding service and eWeddings was squatting on the URL. I guess I was wrong. I thought briefly about using a .org or .net, but it seems like people's default would be to type in .com, so I went with that.
Well, the other Chantal and Curtis have been busy on their web site, too and appear to be getting married on October 28th, 2006. This is freaking me out a little bit. What many of you don't know is that we had the Legion of Honor reserved for October 28th at one point. Another couple put in a competing hold on Legion and we had three days to decide if we wanted the date or not. I won't go into why we decided to pass on that lovely, Bay Area fall, October day (ask Chantal), but we decided to go with April.
However, the connections with our alter egos continue. For example, they are getting married in London, Ontario. While neither of us have ever been there, Chantal did spend most of her youth in London. Creepy. Also, their "Wedding Quiz" indicates that between them they have at least nine piercings. Ditto. Finally, if you click on "Stories" then "Groom's Story," you'll see a picture of Curtis 2 Electric Boogaloo lounging with a cigar and beer and wearing a tank top and shorts (possibly sans underwear). I'm staring at Chantal right now and they could be twins.
Anyway, I wish our namesakes the best and I wonder how many people will visit each others' sites on accident. I knew I should have gone with a more unique URL like thebelowstobe.com, thebaronandbaroness.com or chantalandhergermangod.com. Live and learn.
Permalink |
Foot in Mouth DiseaseCurt learns to think before speaking Posted by Curtis on August 8, 2006
This may not technically have anything to do with either our wedding or our wedding planning, but it probably does fall into the broad category of marital advice I will undoubtedly start receiving between now and, well, forever. The advice is, which I can now comfortably give myself having acquired it through experience, "Think before you speak."
The other night we were tuckering in and I was exhausted after spending an entire day doing yard work and assorted household chores for my mom down in Sunnyvale. Chantal was also clearly out of sorts a bit when she revealed to me in a touching tone, "I think I love you a little more every day." I was half asleep, but not so much as to not realize what a wonderful thing Chantal had just said.
I wanted to reply with a similarly emotive statement and had the words "yesterday," "today," "tomorrow" and "love" swirling in my head. Did I say I was half asleep? Yes? Good. Well, what came out wasn't quite as I had planned. I murmured, "I loved you more yesterday."
As you might expect, that didn't go over so well. Contributing to the scene was the fact that I couldn't stop laughing at what a ridiculous statement I had just uttered. I'm not entirely sure, but I think that helped diffuse most of the tension.
Anyway, I've been hearing about it several times a day now and, well, I deserve it. I like to think of it as a learning experience, though. So, for those of you planning on giving me marital advice, you can check "Think before you speak" off of your lists. I've already learned the pleasures of putting my foot in my mouth.
Permalink |
Tori, Suri, or Chantal?Chantal's first blog posting Posted by Chantal on July 29, 2006
 |
I'm not totally bought into this whole Blog thing. I have a hard time believing that people would have even the remotest interest in our day-to-day lives and wedding planning accomplishments...in fact I'm not even terribly interested in those topics. And yet I find myself strangely enthralled with the life and times of others - will Jen and Vince tie the knot? Does baby Suri exist? Does Justin still harbor feelings for Britney? - so why wouldn't the greater public be curious about us? The key difference of course is that Jen, Vince, Suri, Justin and Britney have a celebrity air about them that makes them fairly intriguing in the pages of US Weekly. With the rise of ofoto.com, I don't even see myself in family photo albums anymore, let alone Pullitzer prize-worthy People and In Touch magazines. I will say, however, that we've worked hard to make this wedding website quite entertaining (so hard in fact that Curtis has indeed become a man obsessed) and I'm hopeful that even if our day-to-day lives are about as interesting as reading about Tori Spelling's tragic rift with her mother, you'll indulge in the occasional chuckle relating to our meeting story or our bridal party and you'll get even more excited about celebrating our approaching April nutials!
Permalink |
ObsessionCurt's obsession with his wedding website Posted by Curtis on July 3, 2006
No, not the perfume/cologne with the excessively dramatic advertising campaign. Rather, my obsession with our wedding website. I was reluctant at first to start work on our website, not because I didn't think I could put something together; rather, because I knew that once I started, I'd have a hard time stopping. Also, working for a software company that makes web hosting software, I knew that there would be a little pressure on me to produce something somewhere between "sucking" and "Webby Award."
Initially, it was Chantal who leaned on me start putting it together. I was told (instructed) that I "needed to get on that" so that we could include a link to our website in our save-the-dates. Now, I'm the one sending Chantal emails with the subject line of "homework," containing lists of content that she needs to write. Luckily, there are few things in the world Chantal likes more than checking off completed tasks on a list, so she is a willing recipient of such emails. (She also thoroughly enjoys creating lists, particulalry for others.)
I knew I was in trouble when I spent over 12 hours on the couch watching World Cup matches and working on the site, completely forgetting to bathe until Chantal returned home to ever so gently remind me to do so. (Incidentally, this helped me discover that working from home on any kind of regular basis simply wouldn't be acceptable from a hygiene perspective.) I probably spend at least an hour each day playing around with something, adding new content, uploading new photos or tweaking my site's style sheets.
At this point, we're probably only 20% done, but the framework is pretty much in place. We still need to find better colors and decide upon a homepage design, but it's coming along. It's probably also about time for me to give Chantal her own login so that she can start adding content herself. I'm a little nervous about her editing anything I may write about her, but I suppose I've got to start trusting her at some point. Why not now?
Permalink |
Welcome to our blog. It will be moderately entertaining.First posting in our wedding blog. Posted by Curtis on June 24, 2006
Yup. Everyone has to have a blog. Why would we be any different?
This is our first posting, probably a couple of weeks before we officially "launch" the site. I'm sitting here watching a great World Cup match between Argentina and Mexico and trying to put together a website. Chantal has put a bit of pressure on me to get one up and running after looking at Mort and Fi's great wedding website. I'm afraid we don't have photos nearly as cool as their's, but we do have this nice picture from Pam's wedding, in which I'm wearing a tie the Jae gave me for his wedding. We almost look classy, huh?
Hopefully, we'll be able to post here regularly enough to keep it interesting. If that doesn't work, we'll make stuff up. As it turns out, we're both pretty good at that.
Permalink |
|
|